christian louboutin pigalle program to overclock

'Column Address Strobe (cycles) / CAS Latency (ns)' inside the chart to one thing a lot more basic like 'tCK in ns' coz most other timings (such as tRCD, tWR) are also multiplications of tCK that is the mem IO period 35v DDR3 and possibility of tighter timingsI do program to overclock the i5 to about four.5ghz perhaps 4.7ghz. I am not to worried about ram overclocking, I'd be truly delighted to run them at stock http://www.topekafirstassembly.com/christian-louboutin I know ram overclocking delivers minimal benefit.I really don't need to drop $ on cas eight or 7 ddr3 1600 ram. I think the cas 9 ought to perform just fine for me. I was just curious in the event the reduce voltage stuf would yeild the possibility of tighter timings.So with all getting equal and not wanting to overclock the ram but I am overclocking the CPU would it be far better to go witht he 1.35v or the 1.5v rated ram?
ah yes comparing the timings inside the actual seconds will be the best way in OC'ing ram, but at the moment i'm preparing to make amd APU sys, there's a confirmed raise in graphics overall performance that's also good to be ignored, by going from 1333 to 1600 even when sacrificing 1 point of CL (benchmarked here llano http://www.topekafirstassembly.com/christian-louboutin-pumps.html)but thanks man, you make me give up the concept of OC'ing low-priced lowvoltage ddr3, i was attracted by the range of secure voltage (eg. 1.35V to 1.5V), pondering there may very well be fantastic OC in the range. now i can merely grab inexpensive low/normalvoltage ddr31600 as you mentioned, commit cash http://www.topekafirstassembly.com/christian-louboutin-peep-toes.html where overall performance raise is far more noticeable assuredbtw, you may choose to change the label
http://www.google.co.uk/